Below is my commentary on the politics behind this hastily crafted, but devastating video released
by the Obama campaign today about John McCain, the Keating Five
Scandal, and the broader issue of the deregulation of America's banking
industry. (Click here to see the website the Obama campaign set up to present the video.)
There are certain American icons, John Wayne for instance, that we
prefer to remember for the character they played — rather than the
person they might have been behind closed doors. I feel the same way
about John McCain.
In this election, no one wanted to see a contest between Senator
Obama and the real John McCain. America would have preferred a contest
between Senator Obama and the character John McCain plays on TV: the
"maverick," the "reformer," the 20th century war icon. Personally, I
feel confident Obama could have defeated either one.
This may be why you have not heard anything from the Obama campaign about John McCain and the Keating Five Scandaluntil
today. It was the weapon they preferred not to use. There were
strategists inside the Obama camp who wanted to drop this bomb on
McCain from the start (it is now a much BIGGER bomb in light of the
current Mortgage Banking Crisis that so closely mirrors the Savings and
Loan Scandal that frames The Keating Five). But by sending Sarah Palin
out to call Barack Obama a terrorist in her latest memorized stump
speech, John McCain has given Obama strategists the excuse to release this 13 minute video that demolishes the character McCain plays on TV, simply by exposing its genesis.
When John McCain was implicated in the Keating Five Scandal, he had
been caught red-handed, using his position as a member of Congress to
enrich himself, his wife, and his friends. He was so humiliated that he
spent the next 20 years trying to atone for it, making it a personal
crusade to accuse others of the same or similar improprieties,
anointing himself the "maverick" of the U.S. Senate by ruffling
feathers in his own party (in general Republicans are against ethics
reform).
In his 20-years of playing a maverick on TV, John McCain has in many
ways become the icon he aspires to be. Certainly in the eyes of
millions of Americans, he is that man. In this way, McCain reminds me
of the infamous televangelist Jimmy Swaggart,
the man who's sexual appetite was so shameful and tortuous, he spent
his lifetime lecturing others about it. Swaggart exposed two other
televangelists for sexual improprieties, ruining their careers, only to
himself be caught in an airport hotel with a prostitute. Swaggart's
tearful "I have sinned against you" performance earned him forgiveness
from his followers and saved his own career. Then he was caught with
another prostitute three years later and that was that.
I have no quarrel with Swaggart's penchant for prostitutes, but I do
have a concern about John McCain's role in the two largest banking
meltdowns in American history, each of which cost American taxpayers
billions and billions of dollars. So, perhaps it was appropriate, in
light of the Mortgage Banking Crisis, to draw obvious comparisons to
McCain and the Savings and Loan Scandal from 20 years ago.
The sad part is, it wasn't necessary. If McCain had stuck to the
issues just a little bit more, instead of building his campaign around
calling Obama a traitor and a terrorist, the media would have been more
than happy to give McCain a free pass on a past sin that he has done
much to atone for. But now that the Obama campaign is talking about The
Keating Five, the media is forced to talk about it.
I had hoped the average American would remember John McCain as a
"maverick" who lost his bid to become President in 2000, and then tried
again in 2008, the year Obama made history.
Now, he may instead be remembered as the Jimmy Swaggart of Senate corruption and billion dollar banking scandals.
Hello everyone. I am in Virginia volunteering for the Obama campaign
(videos coming shortly). Virginia is an important "swing state" in this
election. And, the momentum of this election is also important to
Virginia. Over the past several years, Virginia has been becoming more
diverse, more forward-thinking, and less susceptible to the divisive
politics and racial discord that characterized the 20th century. John
McCain likes to tout his "experience" but the truth is that the
majority of his experience came in another era —— the Cold War era, the
Vietnam Era, the era when Americans could be easily manipulated based
on fear and/or racial divisions. I think that era is over in Virginia.
And I think this election will signal that 20th century fear politics
are over in America.
For those who follow my blogging habits, you know that I was much
more verbose in dissecting the choice between Obama and Clinton during
the primary, than I have been in dissecting the choice between Obama
and McCain in the general election.
This is not because I am any less passionate, or any less convinced,
that Obama is the best choice for our country's future. It's because
the choice is so obvious to me that I don't find it nearly as
interesting to write about it. Besides, others are doing a much better
job than I could:
Meanwhile, the Obama campaign has not had any difficulty pointing out what this choice is about. Obama's 1-minute advertisement
which debuted over the weekend really jumped out at me as the best
campaign ad I have seen, simply because it shows the Candidate himself
explain where his presidency will take us. Click here to see a 2-minute on-line ad that is similar but more detailed.
And then there was the "content" of McCain's speech, admitting guilt
for voting with President Bush more than 90% of the time over the past
eight years of foreign policy and domestic policy disasters, but
begging for another chance because he plans to "shake things up" now
that he has Sarah Palin to hide behind. Huh?
This cartoon in the Washington Post
sums up the irony of claiming you want to "shake things up" when the
polices you propose in the VERY SAME SPEECH are a 90% carbon copy of
those we've suffered under during the last 8 years of Bush/McCain
leadership.
PS: The comment below led me to add this video from 2001: John McCain on The David Letterman, just weeks after the September 11th attacks, saying the "next phase" will be invading Iraq, and justifying the foreign policy disaster that was about to unfold with a deliberate lie -- a scare tactic, implying that the Anthrax attacks that were happening at the time were linked to Iraq. Disgusting. It's one thing to be wrong on foreign policy decisions; but it's a whole different matter when you lie in order to make disastrous foreign policy decisions politically viable. Check this out!!!!
I want to explain that I am not at the Democratic
Convention, I’m watching on TV like millions of other Americans and posting my impressions.
I’ve also been following an exciting and interesting blog by Jennifer Pae, who IS at the convention.
And, here is Hillary Clinton’s speech which I thought was
outstanding, if not as unique nor historic as Michelle Obama’s speech
yesterday. My feeling watching the speech was that she really is and
was a formidable candidate for President. I could have supported her in
a different era, but the nation and the world to become the nation and
the world we can be with the leadership of Barack Obama.
I also thought that Montana Gov. Brian Schweitzer was very good tonight and certainly worth watching. I'm posting Part 2 instead of Part 1 but both are worth watching.
Finally, Virginia's former Governor Mark Warner
is the candidate I am supporting and volunteering for in the Virginia
Senate race this year. His Keynote speech is viewed by many as an
audition to run for President in the future. I heard his speech on the
radio and was pleased with the way he framed the choice as one between
the past and the future. He introduced the idea of new technology and a
need to move into the 21st century. My feeling is that John McCain is
the last 20th century presidential candidate we will see in America.
Eric, How are you? I remember in the Spring of 2007 you came to the Siskel Center here in Chicago and I was glad you were there to answer questions for the audience at Tre. Tre was very provocative. It really made me think. And I reacted to the unfolding subtle action in your film.
I am a songwriter. So what I thought it was interesting how you enlisted two writers to act in your film and that you let the camera roll while they improvised as writers and created double meanings and questions with the intentions in their actions.
A little about myself... some people say I'm unusual because I write, sing songs and perform in Spanish as well as English while I am Asian American, Filipino specifically. I'm really excited 'cos recently Univision called me and asked me to be a celebridad, or celebrity, on their mipagina site. Once I put up the video blog and complete, it becomes official!
I hope to learn more about you, and that I may stand out to you as someone who wants to create art together. I hope there is a chance I may work with you in the future. I live in Chicago and hope we can do lunch sometime somewhere in the US. I'm interested in collaborating with you because your projects have real depth and meaning.
Omg, I'm so excited I didn't realize you're hapa :) I can't wait until I have my own....a family came into my work the other day, and the child was just adorable....btw, this topic another artist on here just created a site called, hapasmama.com :)
Eric Byler (born January 15, 1972) is an American film director, screenwriter and political activist. He identifies as hapa biracial, born to a Chinese American mother and a white American father. He ...
Help support Eric Byler. Get registered to join their fan network, create your own profile, and connect with other friends and artists.
Help support Eric Byler. Get registered to join their fan network, create your own profile, and connect with other friends and artists. Already joined? Sign in now